Comments on the
CBO Baseline Projections
By Alan R. Davis
The
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has released their 2014 projections in a 182
page document. Comments in this “blog”
related to the topic of the Nation’s Debt covered in that document.
The
CBO lists four measures of Debt:
-
Gross
Debt: All debt of the Federal Government
-
Debt
Subject to Limit: Basically the same as the Gross Debt but relating to the
authorized limit passed by Congress.
-
Debt
Held by the Public: Excludes Debt Held by Government Accounts (Trust Funds) but
does include that amount held by the Federal Reserve Board.
-
Debt
Held by the Public less Financial Assets: A technical definition that is
difficult to calculate because of the difficulty in measuring value of the
Financial Assets
The
CBO explains the rationale for concentrating on the “Debt Held by the Public”
as follows:
“(Debt held by the trust funds)...does
not directly affect the economy and has no net effect on the budget.”
So because of that position, it’s hard to find figures for Gross Debt in their report and they repeatedly use Public Debt figures in their analysis. But let’s look at that statement to see if stands up to scrutiny.
“…has no net effect on the budget.”: What they are telling us is since the
government is the issuer and the borrower, those two transactions cancel
themselves out. Also since the
government is paying the interest and receiving the interest those also cancel
themselves out. On a strict accounting
basis, that may be true for any given year.
But it’s not true from the perspective that the government has more debt
that it must pay back at some point in time.
According
to the trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust Funds, that point is
coming relatively soon. In fact the 2013
Trustee Report shows that occurs beginning in 2021. At that point, not only will the Federal
Government have to borrow funds to support the General Fund’s deficit, but also
to start paying back the trust funds.
“…does not
directly affect the economy”:
Economists in Washington tell us that borrowing funds from the trust
funds doesn’t impact the economy in the same way as borrowing directly from the
public. They justify this theory by
saying the funds are sitting idly in the trust funds, while those borrowed from
the public are no longer available for use by the private sector economy.
How
do the funds make it into the trust funds?
They are accumulated through payroll taxes which take money out of the
economy. And when it’s time for the
IOU’s to be paid off, the General Fund will have to increase its borrowings
taking more funds out of the economy than otherwise would be required. So over time borrowing the surpluses from the
trust funds to support deficit spending not only puts the viability of the
trust funds at risk, but it increases the long term borrowing needs of the
General Fund.
Let’s
put that in real terms from my life. My
parents stressed that I should go to college.
Coming from a large family with moderate income, they told me I needed
to make a sincere effort to pay for as much of my college education as I could. So beginning in my junior year of high school
I stopped running track and cross country and got a job. I saved as much as I could and put it in a "college fund". When I got my drivers’ license I had to share
a family car rather than have one of my own.
Had I used the Government’s logic, I could have used the funds I had
saved for my college education to purchase a car since they were sitting
idly. I could have just issued my
college fund IOU’s for the amount I used.
However, when I finally went to college those funds wouldn’t have been
available, would they. How would I have
paid for college? I would have had to borrow the money.
Ignoring the
government account debt is just a way to justify deficit spending and to keep
from having to recognize that our Debt to GDP ratio is now over 100%.
No comments:
Post a Comment